Potential assessment of using dry cooling mode in two different solar thermal power plants.

Taqiy Eddine Boukelia

Abstract

Most of Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) plants are usually installed in desert regions where water resource availability is a critical limitation due to the lack of water required for the exploitation of these systems in these regions. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the techno-economic competitiveness of deploying both modes of cooling (wet and dry) in two different parabolic trough solar thermal power plants integrated with thermal energy storage and fuel backup system; the first one is using thermic oil, while the other is working using molten salt. The obtained results show that the dry cooling mode can decrease the yields of the two power plants down to 8.7 % and 9.3 % for oil and salt configurations respectively. On the other hand, the levelized cost of electricity can increase by using this cooling option up to 9.3 % for oil plant, and 10.0 % for salt one. However, the main advantage of using dry cooling option is reducing water consumption which has been decreased by more than 94 % for both plants. The application of our methodology to other two sites worldwide, confirms the viability of the obtained results. The importance of this results is to show the effect of working fluids on the cooling system of solar power plants.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Zhang HL, et al. Concentrated solar power plants: Review and design methodology. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2013; 22: 466-81.

Reddy KS, Kumar KR. Solar collector field design and viability analysis of stand-alone parabolic trough power plants for Indian conditions. Energ Sustain Dev 2012; 16(4): 456-70.

Boukelia TE, Mecibah MS, Kumar BN, Reddy KS. Investigation of solar parabolic trough power plants with and without integrated TES (thermal energy storage) and FBS (fuel backup system) using thermic oil and solar salt. Energy 2015; 88:292-303.

Boukelia TE, Arslan O, Mecibah MS. Potential assessment of a parabolic trough solar thermal power plant considering hourly analysis: ANN-based approach. Renew Energy 2017; 105: 324-333.

Montes MJ, Abánades A, Martinez-Val JM. Thermofluidynamic model and comparative analysis of parabolic trough collectors using oil, water/steam, or molten salt as heat transfer fluids. J Sol Energ Eng 2010; 132(2): 021001.

Giostri A, et al. Comparison of different solar plants based on parabolic trough technology. Sol Energy 2012; 86(5): 1208-21.

Liqreina A, and Qoaider, L. Dry cooling of concentrating solar power (CSP) plants, an economic competitive option for the desert regions of the MENA region. Sol. Energy 2014; 103: 417-424.

Colmenar-Santos A, et al. Water consumption in solar parabolic trough plants: review and analysis of the southern Spain case. Renew. Sustaina. Energy Rev 2014; 34: 565-577.

Martín M. Optimal annual operation of the dry cooling system of a concentrated solar energy plant in the south of Spain. Energy 2015; 84: 774-782.

Deng, H, and Boehm, RF. An estimation of the performance limits and improvement of dry cooling on trough solar thermal plants. Appl. energy 2011; 88(1): 216-223.

Poullikkas A, Hadjipaschalis I, Kourtis G. A comparative overview of wet and dry cooling systems for Rankine cycle based CSP plants. Trends in Heat & Mass Transfer 2013; 13, 27-50.

Qoaider L, and Liqreina A. Optimization of dry cooled parabolic trough (CSP) plants for the desert regions of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). Sol. Energy 2015; 122: 976-985.

Trabelsi SE, et al. Techno-economic performance of concentrating solar power plants under the climatic conditions of the southern region of Tunisia. Energy Convers. Manage. 2016; 119: 203-214.

Boukelia TE, Mecibah MS. Estimation of direct solar irradiance intercepted by a solar concentrator in different modes of tracking (case study: Algeria). Int. J. Amb Energ 2013; 36 (6): 301-308.

Price H. A parabolic trough solar power plant simulation model. International Solar Energy Conference. Hawaii, USA, 15-18 March 2003.

Wagner MJ, Gilman P. Technical manual for the SAM physical trough model. nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/51825.pdf. Last accessed 07/06/2017.

Montes MJ, Abánades A, Martinez-Val JM, Valdés M. Solar multiple optimization for a solar-only thermal power plant, using oil as heat transfer fluid in the parabolic trough collectors. Sol Energy 2009; 83(12): 2165-76

Montes MJ, Abànades A, Martȋnez-Val JM. Performance of a direct steam generation solar thermal power plant for electricity production as a function of the solar multiple. Sol Energy 2009; 83(5): 679–89,

Larraȋn T, Escobar R, Vergara J. Performance model to assist solar thermal power plant siting in northern Chile based on backup fuel consumption. Renew Energ 2010; 35(8): 1632–43.

Dersch J, et al. Trough integration into power plants—a study on the performance and economy of integrated solar combined cycle systems. Energy 2004; 29(5): 947-959.

NREL. System Advisor Model (SAM) Case study: Andasol-1. sam.nrel.gov/sites/sam.nrel.gov/files/content/case_studies/sam_case_csp_physical_trough_andasol-1_2013-1-15.pdf. Last accessed 07.06.2017.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.47238/ijeca.v2i2.38

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.